A bar chart comparing NFC signal attenuation across different metal surfaces

In actual deployments, not all metals have the same absorption rate of electromagnetic waves. Metals with higher permeability and conductivity will have a stronger shielding effect on signals. The following is a comparison of interference tests conducted in a standard laboratory environment using anti-metal NFC tags of the same specifications:

Metal Material Signal Interference Level Recommended Anti-Metal Layer Thickness Measured Sensing Distance Recovery Rate* Typical Application Scenarios
Aluminum Extremely High ≥0.3mm Approx. 65% Phone Cases, Aluminum Foil Packaging, Cans
Copper High ≥0.3mm Approx. 70% Heat Sinks, Cable Sheaths, Circuit Boards
Stainless Steel Medium ≥0.2mm Approx. 85% Kitchenware, Laboratory Equipment, Escalators
Iron/Mild Steel High (Magnetic Interference) ≥0.2mm Approx. 75% Factory Machinery, Shelves, Toolboxes
Titanium Alloy Medium ≥0.2mm Approx. 80% High-End Electronic Products, Medical Devices

    **Note: Measured Sensing Distance Recovery Rate This refers to the percentage of sensing distance when an anti-metal tag is attached to a metal surface compared to when a regular tag is in a non-metallic environment.

💡 In-depth analysis: Why are aluminum and copper the most difficult to handle?

  • High conductivity barrier: Aluminum and copper are excellent conductors. When electromagnetic waves at 13.56 MHz encounter them, they generate extremely strong reverse electromagnetic fields (eddy currents). This requires anti-metal tags to have ferrite materials with higher magnetic permeability to forcibly change the path of magnetic field lines.
  • Special properties of magnetic metals: Iron and ordinary steel, while having slightly lower electrical conductivity, have high magnetic permeability. They “attract” magnetic field lines, causing detuning of the tag antenna.
  • Advantages of stainless steel: Most stainless steels (such as 304 or 316 grades) are non-magnetic or weakly magnetic, and have low electrical conductivity, thus causing relatively less interference to NFC signals.

🛠️ Deployment Recommendations for B2B Clients

  • For aluminum/copper surfaces: We recommend prioritizing the purchase of rigid anti-metal tags or specially formulated high-performance stickers with a thickness of 0.5mm to ensure basic read redundancy.
  • For stainless steel surfaces: Ultra-thin anti-metal stickers can be selected, achieving good sensing distance while maintaining aesthetics.
  • For mobile devices: If applying to the back of a phone, due to interference from the integrated aluminum alloy frame and battery, the NTAG213 25mm or 30mm circular anti-metal sticker is the most stable and market-proven solution.

For more information,please contact us.

Request A Callback

Our team will contact you as soon as possible.

NFC TAGS
NFC WRISTBANDS
NFC CARDS
NFC STICKERS
NFC KEYCHAIN